lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:58:46 -0800
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Eirin Nya <nyanpasu256@...il.com>,
        Phoenix Huang <phoenix@....com.tw>
Cc:     linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] Input: elantech - Fix incorrectly halved touchpad
 range on ELAN v3 touchpads

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 09:57:51AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 04:15:33AM -0700, Eirin Nya wrote:
> > On Linux 5.19.10, on my laptop (Dell Inspiron 15R SE 7520) with an Elan
> > v3 touchpad (dmesg says "with firmware version 0x450f02"), the reported
> > size of my touchpad (in userspace by calling mtdev_configure() and
> > libevdev_get_abs_maximum(), in kernel space
> > elantech_device_info::x_max/y_max, either way 1470 by 700) is half that
> > of the actual touch range (2940 by 1400), and the upper half of my
> > touchpad reports negative values. As a result, with the Synaptics or
> > libinput X11 driver set to edge scrolling mode, the entire right half of
> > my touchpad has x-values past evdev's reported maximum size, and acts as
> > a giant scrollbar!
> > 
> > The problem is that elantech_setup_ps2() -> elantech_set_absolute_mode()
> > sets up absolute mode and doubles the hardware resolution (doubling the
> > hardware's maximum reported x/y coordinates and its response to
> > ETP_FW_ID_QUERY), *after* elantech_query_info() fetches the touchpad
> > coordinate system size using ETP_FW_ID_QUERY, which gets cached and
> > reported to userspace through ioctl(fd, EVIOCGABS(ABS_X/Y), ...). So the
> > touchpad size reported to userspace (and used to subtract vertical
> > coordinates from) is half the maximum position of actual touches.
> > 
> > This patch splits out a function elantech_query_range_v3() which fetches
> > *only* ETP_FW_ID_QUERY (touchpad size), and calls it a second time if
> > elantech_set_absolute_mode() enables double-size mode. This means the
> > first call is redundant and wasted if a second call occurs, but this
> > minimizes the need to restructure the driver.
> 
> If the setting is indeed double resolution, can we simply multiply x_max
> and y_max by 2 instead of re-querying it?
> 
> Also let's try adding one of Elan engineers for their take in this.
> Phoenix, do you have any suggestions please?

Argh, adding Phoenix for real now.

> 
> > 
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/CAL57YxZNutUVxBtvbVWKMw-V2kqeVB5kTQ5BFdJmN=mdPq8Q8Q@mail.gmail.com/
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/20221008093437.72d0f6b0@dell-void.nyanpasu256.gmail.com.beta.tailscale.net/
> > Fixes: 37548659bb22 ("Input: elantech - query the min/max information beforehand too")
> > Signed-off-by: Eirin Nya <nyanpasu256@...il.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Notes:
> >     Should we move (elantech_set_absolute_mode ->
> >     elantech_write_reg(...0x0b or 0x01)) *earlier* into elantech_query_info()
> >     before "query range information"? See discussion at
> >     https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/20221008093437.72d0f6b0@dell-void.nyanpasu256.gmail.com.beta.tailscale.net/
> > 
> >  drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> > index 263779c031..a2176f0fd3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> > @@ -1006,6 +1006,9 @@ static void elantech_set_rate_restore_reg_07(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> >  		psmouse_err(psmouse, "restoring reg_07 failed\n");
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int elantech_query_range_v3(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> > +				   struct elantech_device_info *info);
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Put the touchpad into absolute mode
> >   */
> > @@ -1047,6 +1050,14 @@ static int elantech_set_absolute_mode(struct psmouse *psmouse)
> >  		if (elantech_write_reg(psmouse, 0x10, etd->reg_10))
> >  			rc = -1;
> >  
> > +		/*
> > +		 * If we boost hardware resolution, we have to re-query
> > +		 * info->x_max and y_max.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (etd->info.set_hw_resolution)
> > +			if (elantech_query_range_v3(psmouse, &etd->info))
> > +				rc = -1;
> > +
> >  		break;
> >  
> >  	case 4:
> > @@ -1671,6 +1682,20 @@ static int elantech_set_properties(struct elantech_device_info *info)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int elantech_query_range_v3(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> > +				   struct elantech_device_info *info)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned char param[3];
> > +
> > +	if (info->send_cmd(psmouse, ETP_FW_ID_QUERY, param))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	info->x_max = (0x0f & param[0]) << 8 | param[1];
> > +	info->y_max = (0xf0 & param[0]) << 4 | param[2];
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int elantech_query_info(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> >  			       struct elantech_device_info *info)
> >  {
> > @@ -1826,11 +1851,8 @@ static int elantech_query_info(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> >  		break;
> >  
> >  	case 3:
> > -		if (info->send_cmd(psmouse, ETP_FW_ID_QUERY, param))
> > +		if (elantech_query_range_v3(psmouse, info))
> >  			return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > -		info->x_max = (0x0f & param[0]) << 8 | param[1];
> > -		info->y_max = (0xf0 & param[0]) << 4 | param[2];
> >  		break;
> >  
> >  	case 4:
> > -- 
> > 2.38.0
> > 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Dmitry

-- 
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ