linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] EDAC/qcom: Get rid of hardcoded register offsets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y4T/YlDdDk7gVdfB@zn.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2022 19:35:14 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
        james.morse@....com, rric@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_saipraka@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] EDAC/qcom: Get rid of hardcoded register offsets

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 11:47:05PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Well, yes but that would imply both LLCC and EDAC patches going together.
> Splitting them will break the build, which is worse.

Sounds like you need to check out:

Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst

first.

Hint: there are provisions in there how to specify dependencies between
commits.

> Sorry, it is because I only tried building for ARM64 architecture. The
> error you are seeing is for x86-64 and I could now reproduce it as
> well.

Yes, because arch doesn't matter here - the .config does.

Therefore, as requested:

"For the next version, you'd need to fix all possible Kconfig build
errors before sending."

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette