[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f89e922c-16d5-0bcf-7e7e-096f42793a36@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 12:00:55 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-block] blk-cgroup: Use css_tryget() in
blkcg_destroy_blkgs()
On 11/28/22 11:56 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/27/22 19:30, Waiman Long wrote:
>> Fixes: 951d1e94801f ("blk-cgroup: Flush stats at blkgs destruction path")
>
> Has Jens' for-next branch perhaps been rebased? I see the following commit ID for that patch:
>
> dae590a6c96c ("blk-cgroup: Flush stats at blkgs destruction path")
I don't know that sha is from, not from me. for-6.2/block has not been
rebased, for-next gets rebased whenever I need to do so as linux-next is
continually rebased anyway. But the sha for that commit would not change
as a result.
I don't even have that sha in my tree, so...
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists