lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2022 20:44:44 +0100
From:   Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To:     limin <limin100@...wei.com>, shuah@...nel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
        shakeelb@...gle.com, songmuchun@...edance.com, tj@...nel.org,
        lizefan.x@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run
 fail

This patch changes the test semantic and then cannot work on my test 
environment. On which kernel did you run test? Do you use Yama or 
something similar?

On 28/11/2022 03:04, limin wrote:
> Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent,
> trace parent return -1 when child== 0
> How to reproduce warning:
> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=landlock run_tests
> 
> Signed-off-by: limin <limin100@...wei.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c | 5 ++---
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c
> index c28ef98ff3ac..88c4dc63eea0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c
> @@ -267,12 +267,11 @@ TEST_F(hierarchy, trace)
>   		/* Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent. */
>   		err_proc_read = test_ptrace_read(parent);
>   		ret = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, parent, NULL, 0);
> +		EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
> +		EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno);
>   		if (variant->domain_child) {
> -			EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
> -			EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno);
>   			EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, err_proc_read);
>   		} else {
> -			EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
>   			EXPECT_EQ(0, err_proc_read);
>   		}
>   		if (ret == 0) {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ