linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 07/16] ufs: core: mcq: Calculate queue depth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2022 12:33:03 -0800
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc:     quic_cang@...cinc.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com,
        quic_xiaosenh@...cinc.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
        eddie.huang@...iatek.com, daejun7.park@...sung.com,
        avri.altman@....com, beanhuo@...ron.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Jinyoung Choi <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
        Arthur Simchaev <Arthur.Simchaev@....com>,
        Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/16] ufs: core: mcq: Calculate queue depth

On 11/28/22 11:54, Asutosh Das wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28 2022 at 07:15 -0800, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:10:20PM -0800, Asutosh Das wrote:
>>> +static inline int ufshcd_mcq_vops_get_hba_mac(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>
>> Again, no inline please.
>>
> It spits out the following warning for all files that include this 
> header, when
> inline is removed:
> warning: 'ufshcd_mcq_vops_get_hba_mac' defined but not used 
> [-Wunused-function]

My understanding is that the "no inline" rule applies to .c files only 
and also that functions defined in header files should be declared 
"static inline".

Thanks,

Bart.