[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a5b523d-711b-d809-06b9-fdada64c9c65@leemhuis.info>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 06:44:13 +0100
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org
Cc: robin.murphy@....com, amit.pundir@...aro.org, andersson@...nel.org,
quic_sibis@...cinc.com, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: dma: Drop cache invalidation from
arch_dma_prep_coherent()"
On 14.11.22 12:03, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> This reverts commit c44094eee32f32f175aadc0efcac449d99b1bbf7.
>
> As reported by Amit [1], dropping cache invalidation from
> arch_dma_prep_coherent() triggers a crash on the Qualcomm SM8250 platform
> (most probably on other Qcom platforms too). The reason is, Qcom
> qcom_q6v5_mss driver copies the firmware metadata and shares it with modem
> for validation. The modem has a secure block (XPU) that will trigger a
> whole system crash if the shared memory is accessed by the CPU while modem
> is poking at it.
> [...]
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAMi1Hd1VBCFhf7+EXWHQWcGy4k=tcyLa7RGiFdprtRnegSG0Mw@mail.gmail.com/
>
I have Amit's report on the list of tracked regressions. I also noticed
the proposed change "arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: fix PCIe DMA coherency":
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221124142501.29314-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org/
I have no expertise in this area, but it looked somewhat related to my
eyes, so please allow me to quickly ask: is that related or even
supposed to fix Amit's regression?
Ciao, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists