linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH V2 16/18] x86/sev: Initialize #HV doorbell and handle interrupt requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0d928bdf-769f-8eca-2e3e-5d6e438ef048@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:47:02 +0800
From:   Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
To:     Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@...hat.com>
Cc:     luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        jgross@...e.com, tiala@...rosoft.com, kirill@...temov.name,
        jiangshan.ljs@...group.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        ashish.kalra@....com, srutherford@...gle.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, anshuman.khandual@....com,
        pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
        daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        sandipan.das@....com, ray.huang@....com, brijesh.singh@....com,
        michael.roth@....com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
        venu.busireddy@...cle.com, sterritt@...gle.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, samitolvanen@...gle.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 16/18] x86/sev: Initialize #HV doorbell and handle
 interrupt requests

On 11/25/2022 7:49 PM, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>> +void check_hv_pending(struct pt_regs *regs)
> This looks like two functions, one with regs == NULL and one with regs,
> different internal logic, different call sites. Would you consider splitting
> into two?
>

Good suggestion. Will update in the next version.