[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221128065923.1180-1-zajec5@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 07:59:22 +0100
From: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, u-boot@...ts.denx.de,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/2] nvmem: core: refactor .cell_post_process() CB arguments
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Pass whole NVMEM cell struct and length pointer as arguments to callback
functions.
This allows:
1. Cells content to be modified based on more info
Some cells (identified by their names) contain specific data that
needs further processing. This can be e.g. MAC address stored in an
ASCII format. NVMEM consumers expect MAC to be read in a binary form.
More complex cells may be additionally described in DT. This change
allows also accessing relevant DT nodes and reading extra info.
2. Adjusting data length
If cell processing results in reformatting it, it's required to
adjust length. This again applies e.g. to the MAC format change from
ASCII to the byte-based.
Later on we may consider more cleanups & features like:
1. Dropping "const char *id" and just using NVMEM cell name
2. Adding extra argument for cells providing multiple values
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
---
This solution conflicts with 1 part of Michael's work:
[PATCH v2 00/20] nvmem: core: introduce NVMEM layouts
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220901221857.2600340-1-michael@walle.cc/
Instead of:
1. Adding NVMEM cell-level post_process callback
2. Adding callback (.fixup_cell_info()) for setting callbacks
3. Dropping NVMEM device-level post_process callback
I decided to refactor existing callback.
Michael's work on adding #nvmem-cell-cells should be possible to easily
rebase on top of those changes.
This doen't add support for 1 cell providing multiple values. That needs
to be added later once we sort out #nvmem-cell-cells bindings. This
fixes the basic case with reformatting cells data.
---
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 19 +++----------------
drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c | 8 ++++----
include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 17 ++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 321d7d63e068..0bc3e26e4ca8 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -46,16 +46,6 @@ struct nvmem_device {
#define to_nvmem_device(d) container_of(d, struct nvmem_device, dev)
#define FLAG_COMPAT BIT(0)
-struct nvmem_cell_entry {
- const char *name;
- int offset;
- int bytes;
- int bit_offset;
- int nbits;
- struct device_node *np;
- struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
- struct list_head node;
-};
struct nvmem_cell {
struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry;
@@ -1416,24 +1406,21 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
int rc;
rc = nvmem_reg_read(nvmem, cell->offset, buf, cell->bytes);
-
if (rc)
return rc;
+ if (len)
+ *len = cell->bytes;
/* shift bits in-place */
if (cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits)
nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(cell, buf);
if (nvmem->cell_post_process) {
- rc = nvmem->cell_post_process(nvmem->priv, id,
- cell->offset, buf, cell->bytes);
+ rc = nvmem->cell_post_process(nvmem->priv, cell, id, buf, len);
if (rc)
return rc;
}
- if (len)
- *len = cell->bytes;
-
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c b/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c
index 14284e866f26..d383989d48bf 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c
@@ -222,8 +222,8 @@ static int imx_ocotp_read(void *context, unsigned int offset,
return ret;
}
-static int imx_ocotp_cell_pp(void *context, const char *id, unsigned int offset,
- void *data, size_t bytes)
+static int imx_ocotp_cell_pp(void *context, struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell,
+ const char *id, void *data, size_t *len)
{
struct ocotp_priv *priv = context;
@@ -233,8 +233,8 @@ static int imx_ocotp_cell_pp(void *context, const char *id, unsigned int offset,
u8 *buf = data;
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < bytes/2; i++)
- swap(buf[i], buf[bytes - i - 1]);
+ for (i = 0; i < cell->bytes / 2; i++)
+ swap(buf[i], buf[cell->bytes - i - 1]);
}
}
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
index 50caa117cb62..b0d2b6af9f37 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
@@ -14,14 +14,25 @@
#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
struct nvmem_device;
-struct nvmem_cell_info;
+
+struct nvmem_cell_entry {
+ const char *name;
+ int offset;
+ int bytes;
+ int bit_offset;
+ int nbits;
+ struct device_node *np;
+ struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
+ struct list_head node;
+};
+
typedef int (*nvmem_reg_read_t)(void *priv, unsigned int offset,
void *val, size_t bytes);
typedef int (*nvmem_reg_write_t)(void *priv, unsigned int offset,
void *val, size_t bytes);
/* used for vendor specific post processing of cell data */
-typedef int (*nvmem_cell_post_process_t)(void *priv, const char *id, unsigned int offset,
- void *buf, size_t bytes);
+typedef int (*nvmem_cell_post_process_t)(void *priv, struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell, const char *id,
+ void *buf, size_t *len);
enum nvmem_type {
NVMEM_TYPE_UNKNOWN = 0,
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists