linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 5/6] x86/hyperv: Support hypercalls for TDX guests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SA1PR21MB1335BAE56BCE81538E220B47BF139@SA1PR21MB1335.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2022 01:36:24 +0000
From:   Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To:     "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        "ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "brijesh.singh@....com" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "jane.chu@...cle.com" <jane.chu@...cle.com>,
        "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com" 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/6] x86/hyperv: Support hypercalls for TDX guests

> From: Michael Kelley (LINUX) <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2022 5:21 PM
> > [...]
> > +u64 hv_tdx_hypercall(u64 control, u64 input_addr, u64 output_addr)
> > +{
> > +	struct tdx_hypercall_args args = { };
> > +
> > +	if (!(control & HV_HYPERCALL_FAST_BIT)) {
> > +		if (input_addr)
> > +			input_addr += ms_hyperv.shared_gpa_boundary;
> 
> At one point when working with the vTOM code, I realized that or'ing in
> the shared_gpa_boundary is probably safer than add'ing it, just in case
> the physical address already has vTOM set.  I don't know if that possibility
> exists here, but it's something to consider as being slightly more robust.
> 
> > +
> > +		if (output_addr)
> > +			output_addr += ms_hyperv.shared_gpa_boundary;
> 
> Same here.

Ok, will use |= in all the reference.