linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: loongson: add bus driver for the loongson i2c controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2022 15:12:54 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Yinbo Zhu <zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
        William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
        Tharun Kumar P <tharunkumar.pasumarthi@...rochip.com>,
        Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>,
        Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
        Tyrone Ting <kfting@...oton.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: loongson: add bus driver for the loongson i2c
 controller

On 28/11/2022 15:02, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 09:00:24PM +0800, Yinbo Zhu wrote:
>> This bus driver supports the Loongson i2c hardware controller in the
>> Loongson platforms and supports to use DTS and ACPI framework to
>> register i2c adapter device resources.
>>
>> The Loongson i2c controller supports operating frequencty is 50MHZ
>> and supports the maximum transmission rate is 400kbps.
> 
> ...


> Why not using the usual pattern, i.e.
> 
> 	if (!(...))
> 		return IRQ_NONE;
> 
> ?
> 
> It seems you ignored some of my comments...
> I stopped here, please check what was given against v1 and try again.

I propose to wait with wasting more time on reviews because you might do
the same work twice:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/822356908305580d601e5b3e424371ed7f220b85.1669359515.git.zhoubinbin@loongson.cn/


Best regards,
Krzysztof