linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 1/8] block, bfq: split sync bfq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2022 07:32:00 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
Cc:     linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arie van der Hoeven <arie.vanderhoeven@...gate.com>,
        Rory Chen <rory.c.chen@...gate.com>,
        Gabriele Felici <felicigb@...il.com>,
        Carmine Zaccagnino <carmine@...minezacc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/8] block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a
 per-actuator basis

On 11/26/22 9:28?AM, Paolo Valente wrote:

[snip walls of quoted, useless text[

Guys, can you please both start properly quoting emails? Leave the bit
in place you are responding too, cut the rest. It's almost impossible to
find the signal in all of that noise.

This isn't an isolated incident, which is why I'm bringing it up. The
context is there in previous emails should anyone need it. Not cutting
any of the text when replying is just lazy and puts the onus on the
reader on digging through the haystack to find the needle.

-- 
Jens Axboe