lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221128145956.6rgswicmtsuxxhdt@riteshh-domain>
Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2022 20:29:56 +0530
From:   "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To:     Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: fix compile warning when ELF_CORE=n while
 COREDUMP=y

On 22/11/28 09:50PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> fix below build warning when ELF_CORE=n while COREDUMP=y:
>
> fs/coredump.c:834:12: warning: ‘dump_emit_page’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>   834 | static int dump_emit_page(struct coredump_params *cprm, struct
>       page *page)
>       |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Fixes: 06bbaa6dc53c: "[coredump] don't use __kernel_write() on kmap_local_page()"

>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> ---
>  fs/coredump.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b/fs/coredump.c
> index 7bad7785e8e6..8663042ebe9c 100644
> --- a/fs/coredump.c
> +++ b/fs/coredump.c
> @@ -831,6 +831,7 @@ static int __dump_skip(struct coredump_params *cprm, size_t nr)
>  	}
>  }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ELF_CORE

Instead of this ^^^, we could even move the definition of dump_emit_page() in
the same #ifdef as of dump_user_range(). Since dump_user_range() is the only
caller of dump_emit_page().

#ifdef CONFIG_ELF_CORE
[here]
int dump_user_range(struct coredump_params *cprm, unsigned long start,
		    unsigned long len)
{..}
#endif

But I guess that's just a nitpick. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>

-ritesh

>  static int dump_emit_page(struct coredump_params *cprm, struct page *page)
>  {
>  	struct bio_vec bvec = {
> @@ -863,6 +864,7 @@ static int dump_emit_page(struct coredump_params *cprm, struct page *page)
>
>  	return 1;
>  }
> +#endif
>
>  int dump_emit(struct coredump_params *cprm, const void *addr, int nr)
>  {
> --
> 2.37.2
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ