linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] selftests: Use "grep -E" instead of "egrep"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:39:25 -0700
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] selftests: Use "grep -E" instead of "egrep"

On 11/22/22 19:27, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> It seems that patch #2~#6 has no conflicts with the other related
> git tree, but patch #1 is conflicted with paulmck/linux-rcu.git dev.
> 
> What should I do?
> 
> Shuah, could you please apply patch #2~#6 to your linux-kselftest.git next branch and ignore patch #1?
> 
> And then let me send a seperate patch #1 rebased on paulmck/linux-rcu.git dev branch to rcu@...r.kernel.org.
> 

That won't work because linux-kselftest next won't have the linux-rcu content.
I already picked patches 1,2,6

Patches 3 (powerpc) and 5 (net) go through powerpc and net trees. Please resend
just those cc'ing the right people. get_maintainers.pl will give you the info.

As for patch 1 - perhaps the conflict could be resolved in next.

Paul, would you like me to drop rcutorture patch from linux-kselftest next?

thanks,
-- Shuah