linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] selftests: Use "grep -E" instead of "egrep"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d48804d5-2ad5-fbfb-ce17-83fbc450d3d6@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2022 15:24:32 -0700
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     paulmck@...nel.org
Cc:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] selftests: Use "grep -E" instead of "egrep"

On 11/29/22 15:13, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 02:39:25PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 11/22/22 19:27, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>> It seems that patch #2~#6 has no conflicts with the other related
>>> git tree, but patch #1 is conflicted with paulmck/linux-rcu.git dev.
>>>
>>> What should I do?
>>>
>>> Shuah, could you please apply patch #2~#6 to your linux-kselftest.git next branch and ignore patch #1?
>>>
>>> And then let me send a seperate patch #1 rebased on paulmck/linux-rcu.git dev branch to rcu@...r.kernel.org.
>>>
>>
>> That won't work because linux-kselftest next won't have the linux-rcu content.
>> I already picked patches 1,2,6
>>
>> Patches 3 (powerpc) and 5 (net) go through powerpc and net trees. Please resend
>> just those cc'ing the right people. get_maintainers.pl will give you the info.
>>
>> As for patch 1 - perhaps the conflict could be resolved in next.
>>
>> Paul, would you like me to drop rcutorture patch from linux-kselftest next?
> 
> I would be happy to carry the rcutorture patch, especially if doing so
> makes life easier.  ;-)
> 
> But please do send me some sort of pointer to the patch.  Otherwise,
> I guarantee you that I will queue the wrong one.
> 

I have it queued up in linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.2-rc1 - if it is easier
we can just resolve the merge in next.

thanks,
-- Shuah