[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874juhv0fe.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 23:52:05 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] x86: vdso: Wire up getrandom() vDSO implementation
On Tue, Nov 29 2022 at 22:06, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hook up the generic vDSO implementation to the x86 vDSO data page. Since
> the existing vDSO infrastructure is heavily based on the timekeeping
> functionality, which works over arrays of bases, a new macro is
> introduced for vvars that are not arrays.
>
> The vDSO function requires a ChaCha20 implementation that does not write
> to the stack, yet can still do an entire ChaCha20 permutation, so
> provide this using SSE2, since this is userland code that must work on
> all x86-64 processors.
Way more consumable and looks about right. Please take your time and
give others a chance to look at this lot before rushing out v11.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists