[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y4WnjiE2IxDgi5mc@euler>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 22:32:46 -0800
From: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
To: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 06/10] dt-bindings: net: dsa:
mediatek,mt7530: fix port description location
Hi Arınç,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 11:28:31AM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 28.11.2022 01:47, Colin Foster wrote:
> > The description property was located where it applies to every port, not
> > just ports 5 or 6 (CPU ports). Fix this description.
>
> I'm not sure I understand. The description for reg does apply to every port.
> Both CPU ports and user ports are described. This patch moves the
> description to under CPU ports only.
You're right. I misinterpreted what Rob suggested, so the commit message
isn't correct. I see now that reg applies to every port, but is only
restricted for CPU ports (if: required: [ ethernet ]). I'll clean this
message up.
>
> >
> > Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v2 -> v3
> > * New patch.
> >
> > ---
> > .../bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml | 14 +++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
> > index 7df4ea1901ce..415e6c40787e 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
> > @@ -156,17 +156,6 @@ patternProperties:
> > patternProperties:
> > "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$":
> > - type: object
> > - description: Ethernet switch ports
> > -
> > - unevaluatedProperties: false
> > -
>
> Would be nice to mention these being removed on the patch log. Or remove
> them while doing ("dt-bindings: net: dsa: utilize base definitions for
> standard dsa switches").
Agreed. My gut is telling me this wants to be in a separate patch from
the generic DSA base definitions patch... but I can't say why for
certain. I'll plan to move these to the patch you suggest and add a comment
in there about how the type, description, and unevaluatedProperties of
mediatek,mt7530 is no longer needed as a result? Keep this patch as more
of a "restrict custom port description to CPU ports only" patch?
I also see that ("dt-bindings: net: dsa: mediatek,mt7530: remove unnecessary
dsa-port reference") should probably be earlier in this patch set. I'll
plan to move that earlier in the series, before ("dt-bindings: net: dsa:
utilize base definitions for standard dsa switches").
>
> > - properties:
> > - reg:
> > - description:
> > - Port address described must be 5 or 6 for CPU port and from 0 to 5
> > - for user ports.
> > -
> > allOf:
> > - $ref: dsa-port.yaml#
> > - if:
> > @@ -174,6 +163,9 @@ patternProperties:
> > then:
> > properties:
> > reg:
> > + description:
> > + Port address described must be 5 or 6 for CPU port and from
> > + 0 to 5 for user ports
> > enum:
> > - 5
> > - 6
>
> Thank you for your efforts.
I greatly appreciate your help and feedback!
>
> Arınç
Powered by blists - more mailing lists