[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25533005-60bf-a9bb-d6a0-d14e1804291a@arinc9.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 11:00:53 +0300
From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 06/10] dt-bindings: net: dsa: mediatek,mt7530:
fix port description location
Hey Colin,
On 29.11.2022 09:32, Colin Foster wrote:
> Hi Arınç,
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 11:28:31AM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>> On 28.11.2022 01:47, Colin Foster wrote:
>>> The description property was located where it applies to every port, not
>>> just ports 5 or 6 (CPU ports). Fix this description.
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand. The description for reg does apply to every port.
>> Both CPU ports and user ports are described. This patch moves the
>> description to under CPU ports only.
>
> You're right. I misinterpreted what Rob suggested, so the commit message
> isn't correct. I see now that reg applies to every port, but is only
> restricted for CPU ports (if: required: [ ethernet ]). I'll clean this
> message up.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v2 -> v3
>>> * New patch.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml | 14 +++-----------
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
>>> index 7df4ea1901ce..415e6c40787e 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
>>> @@ -156,17 +156,6 @@ patternProperties:
>>> patternProperties:
>>> "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$":
>>> - type: object
>>> - description: Ethernet switch ports
>>> -
>>> - unevaluatedProperties: false
>>> -
>>
>> Would be nice to mention these being removed on the patch log. Or remove
>> them while doing ("dt-bindings: net: dsa: utilize base definitions for
>> standard dsa switches").
>
> Agreed. My gut is telling me this wants to be in a separate patch from
> the generic DSA base definitions patch... but I can't say why for
> certain. I'll plan to move these to the patch you suggest and add a comment
If I understand correctly, with ("dt-bindings: net: dsa: utilize base
definitions for standard dsa switches"), these properties are now
defined on dsa.yaml#/$defs/base and no longer needed to be defined here
since mediatek,mt7530.yaml was also made to refer to it. It'd make sense
to remove these properties there as there's continuity.
> in there about how the type, description, and unevaluatedProperties of
> mediatek,mt7530 is no longer needed as a result? Keep this patch as more
> of a "restrict custom port description to CPU ports only" patch?
I'd say get rid of this patch and do above. Trust your gut though. ;P
Arınç
Powered by blists - more mailing lists