| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2fb2453f-2d82-5fe9-bc4e-7ec5150441ac@alu.unizg.hr>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:59:26 +0100
From: Mirsad Goran Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Joey Pabalan <jpabalanb@...il.com>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>,
Wang Hai <wanghai26@...wei.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: BUG: kworker + systemd-udevd memory leaks found in 6.1.0-rc4
On 29.11.2022. 9:36, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 04:35:10AM +0100, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
>> On 10. 11. 2022. 10:20, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 05:57:57AM +0100, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
>>>> On 04. 11. 2022. 11:40, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Sirs,
>>>>>
>>>>> When building a RPM 6.1.0-rc3 for AlmaLinux 8.6, I have enabled
>>>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y
>>>>> and the result showed an unreferenced object in kworker process:
>>>>>
>>>>> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
>>>>> unreferenced object 0xffffa01dabff6100 (size 16):
>>>>> comm "kworker/u12:4", pid 400, jiffies 4294894771 (age 5284.956s)
>>>>> hex dump (first 16 bytes):
>>>>> 6d 65 6d 73 74 69 63 6b 30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 memstick0.......
>>>>> backtrace:
>>>>> [<000000009ff951f6>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x380/0x4e0
>>>>> [<00000000451f4268>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x55/0x150
>>>>> [<0000000005472512>] kstrdup+0x36/0x70
>>>>> [<000000002f797ac4>] kstrdup_const+0x28/0x30
>>>>> [<00000000e3f86581>] kvasprintf_const+0x78/0xa0
>>>>> [<00000000e15920f7>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x23/0xa0
>>>>> [<000000004158a6c0>] dev_set_name+0x53/0x70
>>>>> [<000000001a120541>] memstick_check+0xff/0x384 [memstick]
>>>>> [<00000000122bb894>] process_one_work+0x214/0x3f0
>>>>> [<00000000fcf282cc>] worker_thread+0x34/0x3d0
>>>>> [<0000000002409855>] kthread+0xed/0x120
>>>>> [<000000007b02b4a3>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>>>>> unreferenced object 0xffffa01dabff6ec0 (size 16):
>>>>> comm "kworker/u12:4", pid 400, jiffies 4294894774 (age 5284.944s)
>>>>> hex dump (first 16 bytes):
>>>>> 6d 65 6d 73 74 69 63 6b 30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 memstick0.......
>>>>> backtrace:
>>>>> [<000000009ff951f6>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x380/0x4e0
>>>>> [<00000000451f4268>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x55/0x150
>>>>> [<0000000005472512>] kstrdup+0x36/0x70
>>>>> [<000000002f797ac4>] kstrdup_const+0x28/0x30
>>>>> [<00000000e3f86581>] kvasprintf_const+0x78/0xa0
>>>>> [<00000000e15920f7>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x23/0xa0
>>>>> [<000000004158a6c0>] dev_set_name+0x53/0x70
>>>>> [<000000001a120541>] memstick_check+0xff/0x384 [memstick]
>>>>> [<00000000122bb894>] process_one_work+0x214/0x3f0
>>>>> [<00000000fcf282cc>] worker_thread+0x34/0x3d0
>>>>> [<0000000002409855>] kthread+0xed/0x120
>>>>> [<000000007b02b4a3>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>>>>> #
>>>>>
>>>>> Please fing the build config and lshw output attached.
>>>>>
>>>>> dmesg is useless, as it is filled with events like:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 6068.996120] evbug: Event. Dev: input4, Type: 1, Code: 31, Value: 0
>>>>> [ 6068.996121] evbug: Event. Dev: input4, Type: 0, Code: 0, Value: 0
>>>>> [ 6069.124145] evbug: Event. Dev: input4, Type: 4, Code: 4, Value: 458762
>>>>> [ 6069.124149] evbug: Event. Dev: input4, Type: 1, Code: 34, Value: 1
>>>>> [ 6069.124150] evbug: Event. Dev: input4, Type: 0, Code: 0, Value: 0
>>>>> [ 6069.196003] evbug: Event. Dev: input4, Type: 4, Code: 4, Value: 458762
>>>>> [ 6069.196007] evbug: Event. Dev: input4, Type: 1, Code: 34, Value: 0
>>>>> [ 6069.196009] evbug: Event. Dev: input4, Type: 0, Code: 0, Value: 0
>>>>> [ 6069.788129] evbug: Event. Dev: input4, Type: 4, Code: 4, Value: 458792
>>>>> [ 6069.788133] evbug: Event. Dev: input4, Type: 1, Code: 28, Value: 1
>>>>> [ 6069.788135] evbug: Event. Dev: input4, Type: 0, Code: 0, Value: 0
>>>>
>>>> This bug is confirmed in 6.1-rc4, among the "thermald" and "systemd-dev"
>>>> kernel memory leaks, potentially exposing race conditions or other more
>>>> serious bug.
>>>
>>> How is a memory leak a race condition?
>>>
>>>> The bug is now also confirmed and now manifested also in the Ubuntu 22.04
>>>> LTS jammy 6.1-rc4 build.
>>>>
>>>> Here is the kmemleak output:
>>>>
>>>> unreferenced object 0xffff9242b13b3980 (size 64):
>>>> comm "kworker/5:3", pid 43106, jiffies 4305052439 (age 71828.792s)
>>>> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>>>> 80 8b a0 f0 42 92 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ....B...........
>>>> 20 86 a0 f0 42 92 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ...B...........
>>>> backtrace:
>>>> [<00000000c5dea4db>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x380/0x4e0
>>>> [<000000002b17af47>] kmalloc_node_trace+0x27/0xa0
>>>> [<000000004c09eee5>] xhci_alloc_command+0x6e/0x180
>>>
>>> This is a totally different backtrace from above, how are they related?
>>>
>>> This looks like a potential xhci issue. Can you use 'git bisect' to
>>> track down the offending change that caused this?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>> Hello, Greg, Thorsten!
>>
>> After multiple attempts, my box's UEFI refuses to run pre-4.17 kernels.
>> The bisect shows the problem appeared before 4.17, so unless I find what is
>> causing black screen when booting pre-4.17 kernels, it's a no-go ... :(
>
> Ok, so I guess this has always been an issue, and is not a regression,
> which is good. Can you work with the memstick developers to find a
> solution?
Hi, Greg,
Of course, I will gladly cooperate with the memstick team.
I will CC: everyone with commits to the memstick driver, I hope that's
not too awkward.
So far, the Code of Conduct says to inform the maintainers about the bug.
BTW, the bug is confirmed as unfixed in 6.1-rc7:
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
unreferenced object 0xffff93e548ab1e90 (size 16):
comm "kworker/u12:5", pid 405, jiffies 4294894087 (age 65919.068s)
hex dump (first 16 bytes):
6d 65 6d 73 74 69 63 6b 30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 memstick0.......
backtrace:
[<00000000942f1553>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x380/0x4e0
[<00000000555b3e8a>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x55/0x140
[<000000000b60a98a>] kstrdup+0x36/0x70
[<00000000f9a4a52a>] kstrdup_const+0x28/0x30
[<000000005c5ca378>] kvasprintf_const+0x78/0xa0
[<00000000b8f94e41>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x23/0xa0
[<00000000b7a2c8ea>] dev_set_name+0x53/0x70
[<00000000291af717>] memstick_check+0xff/0x384 [memstick]
[<000000007b776e48>] process_one_work+0x214/0x3f0
[<000000005791f9b2>] worker_thread+0x34/0x3d0
[<00000000df696ef8>] kthread+0xed/0x120
[<0000000016f05dd5>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
#
Thanks,
Mirsad
--
Mirsad Todorovac
System engineer
Faculty of Graphic Arts | Academy of Fine Arts
University of Zagreb
Republic of Croatia, the European Union
--
Sistem inženjer
Grafički fakultet | Akademija likovnih umjetnosti
Sveučilište u Zagrebu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists