linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: qcom: lpass-sc7180: Delete redundant error log from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <166972648016.69085.432837268858452614.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:54:40 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...cinc.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Cc:     Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Judy Hsiao <judyhsiao@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: qcom: lpass-sc7180: Delete redundant error log from _resume()

On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:16:54 +0000, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> sc7180_lpass_dev_resume() logs an error if clk_bulk_prepare_enable()
> fails. The clock framework already generates error logs if anything
> goes wrong, so the logging in _resume() is redundant, drop it.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: qcom: lpass-sc7180: Delete redundant error log from _resume()
      commit: 863b9179cee4570e5da4206dcf8dbcdcc37c8348

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark