linux-kernel - [PATCH] Documentation: Fixed a typo in atomic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SL2PR01MB281219C24708CE54EC1FC610F8129@SL2PR01MB2812.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2022 18:50:59 +0530
From:   Kushagra Verma <kushagra765@...look.com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
        Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
        Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: Fixed a typo in atomic_t.txt

Fixed a typo in the word 'architecture'.

Signed-off-by: Kushagra Verma <kushagra765@...look.com>
---
 Documentation/atomic_t.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
index 0f1ffa03db09..d7adc6d543db 100644
--- a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
+++ b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ atomic operations.
 
 Specifically 'simple' cmpxchg() loops are expected to not starve one another
 indefinitely. However, this is not evident on LL/SC architectures, because
-while an LL/SC architecure 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
+while an LL/SC architecture 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
 guarantees between competing LL/SC sections, such a guarantee does not
 transfer to cmpxchg() implemented using LL/SC. Consider:
 
-- 
2.38.1