[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y4YNNb+05iEZhZfp@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 13:46:29 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] phy: aquantia: Determine rate adaptation
support from registers
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 02:39:59PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > >> This commit should not get backported until it soaks in master for a
> > >> while.
> > >
> > > You will have to monitor the emails from stable to achieve that - as you
> > > have a Fixes tag, that will trigger it to be picked up fairly quicky.
> >
> > I know; this is a rather vain attempt :)
> >
> > If I had not added the fixes tag, someone would have asked me to add it.
>
> Hi Sean
>
> If you had put a comment under the --- that you deliberately did not
> add a Fixes tag because you wanted it to soak for a while, you
> probably would not be asked.
>
> I think the bot also looks at the subject to decide if it is a fix. So
> you need to word the subject so it sounds like continuing development,
> not a fix.
Sasha makes use of Google's AI. I believe it looks at the entire patch
and commit message, and can make some really strange decisions.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists