linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 3/4] rcu/kvfree: Move need_offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221129155822.538434-4-urezki@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:58:21 +0100
From:   "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.iitr10@...il.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
        Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...y.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] rcu/kvfree: Move need_offload_krc() out of krcp->lock

Currently a need_offload_krc() function requires the krcp->lock
to be held because krcp->head can not be checked concurrently.

Fix it by updating the krcp->head using WRITE_ONCE() macro so
it becomes lock-free and safe for readers to see a valid data
without any locking.

Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 445f8c11a9a3..c94c17194299 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3058,7 +3058,7 @@ static void kfree_rcu_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
 			// objects queued on the linked list.
 			if (!krwp->head_free) {
 				krwp->head_free = krcp->head;
-				krcp->head = NULL;
+				WRITE_ONCE(krcp->head, NULL);
 			}
 
 			WRITE_ONCE(krcp->count, 0);
@@ -3072,6 +3072,8 @@ static void kfree_rcu_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
 		}
 	}
 
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+
 	// If there is nothing to detach, it means that our job is
 	// successfully done here. In case of having at least one
 	// of the channels that is still busy we should rearm the
@@ -3079,8 +3081,6 @@ static void kfree_rcu_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
 	// still in progress.
 	if (need_offload_krc(krcp))
 		schedule_delayed_monitor_work(krcp);
-
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
 }
 
 static enum hrtimer_restart
@@ -3250,7 +3250,7 @@ void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr)
 
 		head->func = ptr;
 		head->next = krcp->head;
-		krcp->head = head;
+		WRITE_ONCE(krcp->head, head);
 		success = true;
 	}
 
@@ -3327,15 +3327,12 @@ static struct shrinker kfree_rcu_shrinker = {
 void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp = per_cpu_ptr(&krc, cpu);
 
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
 		if (need_offload_krc(krcp))
 			schedule_delayed_monitor_work(krcp);
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2