[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y4eU7ra4w3Fm+wLM@google.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:37:50 +0000
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>,
agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, quic_plai@...cinc.com, bgoswami@...cinc.com,
perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
swboyd@...omium.org, judyhsiao@...omium.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: lpass-sc7180: Add maybe_unused tag for
system PM ops
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 05:16:11PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 05:07:46PM +0000, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 06:23:48PM +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
>
> > > Add __maybe_unused tag for system PM ops suspend and resume.
> > > This is required to fix allmodconfig compilation issue.
> > > Fixes: c3bf7699747c ("ASoC: qcom: lpass-sc7280: Add system suspend/resume PM ops")
>
> > This is incorrect, it should be '2d68148f8f85 ("ASoC: qcom: lpass-sc7180: Add
> > system suspend/resume PM ops")'. I see you fixed that in v2, but this patch
> > has already been applied ...
>
> with the fixes tag already updated as I was applying it.
The tag of the applied patch is incorrect too, which is actually what I noticed:
Fixes: a3a96e93cc88 ("ASoC: qcom: lpass-sc7280: Add system suspend/resume PM ops")
This patch is for sc7180, so it should be:
Fixes: 2d68148f8f85 ("ASoC: qcom: lpass-sc7180: Add system suspend/resume PM ops")
> > Mark, I appreciate you being responsive and picking patches quickly, it might
> > help though to leave 'external' reviewers at least some time to provide their
> > feedback :)
>
> There's a balance with hanging on for utterly trivial patches to get
> reviewed, especially in areas where reviews aren't relaible or
> consistent.
I understand it's a balance and I certainly can't claim to be a regular reviewer
of audio patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists