linux-kernel - [PATCH] KVM: selftests: restore special vmmcall code layout needed by the harness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221130181147.9911-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:11:47 -0500
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: restore special vmmcall code layout needed by the harness

Commit 8fda37cf3d41 ("KVM: selftests: Stuff RAX/RCX with 'safe' values
in vmmcall()/vmcall()", 2022-11-21) broke the svm_nested_soft_inject_test
because it placed a "pop rbp" instruction after vmmcall.  While this is
correct and mimics what is done in the VMX case, this particular test
expects a ud2 instruction right after the vmmcall, so that it can skip
over it in the L1 part of the test.

Inline a suitably-modified version of vmmcall() to restore the
functionality of the test.

Fixes: 8fda37cf3d41 ("KVM: selftests: Stuff RAX/RCX with 'safe' values in vmmcall()/vmcall()"
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
---
 .../kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c        | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c
index e497ace629c1..b34980d45648 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c
@@ -41,8 +41,17 @@ static void guest_int_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
 static void l2_guest_code_int(void)
 {
 	GUEST_ASSERT_1(int_fired == 1, int_fired);
-	vmmcall();
-	ud2();
+
+	/*
+         * Same as the vmmcall() function, but with a ud2 sneaked after the
+         * vmmcall.  The caller injects an exception with the return address
+         * increased by 2, so the "pop rbp" must be after the ud2 and we cannot
+	 * use vmmcall() directly.
+         */
+	__asm__ __volatile__("push %%rbp; vmmcall; ud2; pop %%rbp"
+                             : : "a"(0xdeadbeef), "c"(0xbeefdead)
+                             : "rbx", "rdx", "rsi", "rdi", "r8", "r9",
+                               "r10", "r11", "r12", "r13", "r14", "r15");
 
 	GUEST_ASSERT_1(bp_fired == 1, bp_fired);
 	hlt();
-- 
2.31.1