[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <834c5b42-1992-e444-fe7b-2c0a28d71f60@sholland.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:43:15 -0600
From: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
To: Aren Moynihan <aren@...cevolution.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: axp20x: fix order of pek rise and fall events
On 11/23/22 17:07, Aren Moynihan wrote:
> The power button can get "stuck" if the rising edge and falling edge irq
> are read in the same pass. This can often be triggered when resuming
> from suspend if the power button is released before the kernel handles
> the interrupt.
>
> Swapping the order of the rise and fall events makes sure that the press
> event is handled first, which prevents this situation.
Indeed. This is probably the simplest solution, but I think it deserves
a comment in at least one place that the order intentionally mismatches
the order of the bits in the register.
> Signed-off-by: Aren Moynihan <aren@...cevolution.org>
> ---
> include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h b/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
> index 9ab0e2fca7ea..a13ba2bdd01f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
> @@ -432,8 +432,8 @@ enum {
> AXP152_IRQ_PEK_SHORT,
> AXP152_IRQ_PEK_LONG,
> AXP152_IRQ_TIMER,
> - AXP152_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> AXP152_IRQ_PEK_FAL_EDGE,
> + AXP152_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> AXP152_IRQ_GPIO3_INPUT,
> AXP152_IRQ_GPIO2_INPUT,
> AXP152_IRQ_GPIO1_INPUT,
> @@ -472,8 +472,8 @@ enum {
> AXP20X_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL1,
> AXP20X_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL2,
> AXP20X_IRQ_TIMER,
> - AXP20X_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> AXP20X_IRQ_PEK_FAL_EDGE,
> + AXP20X_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> AXP20X_IRQ_GPIO3_INPUT,
> AXP20X_IRQ_GPIO2_INPUT,
> AXP20X_IRQ_GPIO1_INPUT,
> @@ -502,8 +502,8 @@ enum axp22x_irqs {
> AXP22X_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL1,
> AXP22X_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL2,
> AXP22X_IRQ_TIMER,
> - AXP22X_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> AXP22X_IRQ_PEK_FAL_EDGE,
> + AXP22X_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> AXP22X_IRQ_GPIO1_INPUT,
> AXP22X_IRQ_GPIO0_INPUT,
> };
> @@ -571,8 +571,8 @@ enum axp803_irqs {
> AXP803_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL1,
> AXP803_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL2,
> AXP803_IRQ_TIMER,
> - AXP803_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> AXP803_IRQ_PEK_FAL_EDGE,
> + AXP803_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> AXP803_IRQ_PEK_SHORT,
> AXP803_IRQ_PEK_LONG,
> AXP803_IRQ_PEK_OVER_OFF,
> @@ -623,8 +623,8 @@ enum axp809_irqs {
> AXP809_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL1,
> AXP809_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL2,
> AXP809_IRQ_TIMER,
> - AXP809_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> AXP809_IRQ_PEK_FAL_EDGE,
> + AXP809_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> AXP809_IRQ_PEK_SHORT,
> AXP809_IRQ_PEK_LONG,
> AXP809_IRQ_PEK_OVER_OFF,
You should also update APX288 and APX806, which name the IRQs "POK"
instead of "PEK" for some reason.
Regards,
Samuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists