[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc2f8ded-f88b-66d0-3ec1-9e1cd74b493f@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:33:54 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Xiangsheng Hou (侯祥胜)
<Xiangsheng.Hou@...iatek.com>,
"miquel.raynal@...tlin.com" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"gch981213@...il.com" <gch981213@...il.com>,
"vigneshr@...com" <vigneshr@...com>,
"richard@....at" <richard@....at>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Benliang Zhao (赵本亮)
<Benliang.Zhao@...iatek.com>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Bin Zhang (章斌) <bin.zhang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] dt-bindings: spi: mtk-snfi: add mt7986 IC snfi
bindings
On 30/11/2022 09:18, Xiangsheng Hou (侯祥胜) wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 08:47 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 03:50, Xiangsheng Hou (侯祥胜) wrote:
>>>
>>>>> clocks:
>>>>> + minItems: 2
>>>>> items:
>>>>> - description: clock used for the controller
>>>>> - description: clock used for the SPI bus
>>>>> + - description: clock used for the AHB bus dma bus, this
>>>>> depends on
>>>>> + hardware design, so this is optional.
>>>>
>>>> Optional for which variants? For all of them?
>>>
>>> It`s only needed for the item 3 nfi_hclk. Is it proper with this
>>> description or any other suggestion.
>>
>> I understand third clock is optional. For which variants/compatibles
>> it
>> is optional? Add allOf:if:then restricting it.
>
> The MediaTek SPI NAND controller IP used by MT7986 is the newest.
> In the future, there will have other SoCs.
> If add restricting on this, may not easy to maintain.
> Does this acceptable?
I don't think it is not easy to maintain. We have it in many, many
bindings...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists