[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6c8867d-6c33-3baf-f672-bd235e839119@hisilicon.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 16:59:13 +0800
From: "xuhaoyue (A)" <xuhaoyue1@...ilicon.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: <leon@...nel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 for-rc 0/2] Fix sge_num bug
Sorry about that. I will pay more attention to the commit messages in the future.
Could you give me some advice about it? Which patch makes it confusing?
Thanks,
haoyue
On 2022/11/19 8:23:21, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 09:38:45PM +0800, Haoyue Xu wrote:
>> The patchset mainly fixes the sge_num bug relates to sq_inline.
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> 1. Move the refactor rq_inline and new CQE inline patches to go
>> into for-next after this bugfix apply.
>> 2. Change the commit message to better explain the bug.
>> V2 Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/cover/20221026095054.2384620-1-xuhaoyue1@hisilicon.com/
>>
>> Luoyouming (2):
>> RDMA/hns: Fix ext_sge num error when post send
>> RDMA/hns: Fix the problem of sge nums
>
> It is still not clear what the bugs are from the commit messages, and
> the second is a bit big, so I put this in for-next
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists