[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1673ef8b-179e-3b03-b3f8-8d347c70d8c3@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:31:20 +0000
From: <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To: <jiajie.ho@...rfivetech.com>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...il.dk>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] riscv: dts: starfive: Add crypto and DMA node for
VisionFive 2
Hey Jia Jie Ho,
On 30/11/2022 05:52, Jia Jie Ho wrote:
> [You don't often get email from jiajie.ho@...rfivetech.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> Adding StarFive crypto IP and DMA controller node
> to VisionFive 2 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Jie Ho <jiajie.ho@...rfivetech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Huan Feng <huan.feng@...rfivetech.com>
Out of curiosity, what was Huan Feng's contribution to this patch?
Did they co-develop it, or is there some other reason?
> ---
> .../jh7110-starfive-visionfive-v2.dts | 8 +++++
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
I figure Emil will likely see anyway, but whenever you get actual
review comments and send a v2 - please don't drop people that
get_maintainer.pl tells you are responsible for the code in
question.
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-v2.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-v2.dts
> index 450e920236a5..da2aa4d597f3 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-v2.dts
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-v2.dts
> @@ -115,3 +115,11 @@ &tdm_ext {
> &mclk_ext {
> clock-frequency = <49152000>;
> };
> +
> +&sec_dma {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&crypto {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
In what scenario would you not want to have these enabled?
Thanks,
Conor.
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> index 4ac159d79d66..745a5650882c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> @@ -455,5 +455,41 @@ uart5: serial@...20000 {
> reg-shift = <2>;
> status = "disabled";
> };
> +
> + sec_dma: sec_dma@...08000 {
> + compatible = "arm,pl080", "arm,primecell";
> + arm,primecell-periphid = <0x00041080>;
> + reg = <0x0 0x16008000 0x0 0x4000>;
> + reg-names = "sec_dma";
> + interrupts = <29>;
> + clocks = <&stgcrg JH7110_STGCLK_SEC_HCLK>,
> + <&stgcrg JH7110_STGCLK_SEC_MISCAHB>;
> + clock-names = "sec_hclk","apb_pclk";
> + resets = <&stgcrg JH7110_STGRST_SEC_TOP_HRESETN>;
> + reset-names = "sec_hre";
> + lli-bus-interface-ahb1;
> + mem-bus-interface-ahb1;
> + memcpy-burst-size = <256>;
> + memcpy-bus-width = <32>;
> + #dma-cells = <2>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + crypto: crypto@...00000 {
> + compatible = "starfive,jh7110-crypto";
> + reg = <0x0 0x16000000 0x0 0x4000>;
> + reg-names = "secreg";
> + clocks = <&stgcrg JH7110_STGCLK_SEC_HCLK>,
> + <&stgcrg JH7110_STGCLK_SEC_MISCAHB>;
> + clock-names = "sec_hclk","sec_ahb";
> + resets = <&stgcrg JH7110_STGRST_SEC_TOP_HRESETN>;
> + reset-names = "sec_hre";
> + enable-side-channel-mitigation;
> + enable-dma;
> + dmas = <&sec_dma 1 2>,
> + <&sec_dma 0 2>;
> + dma-names = "sec_m","sec_p";
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> };
> };
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists