[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202211301744378304494@zte.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:44:37 +0800 (CST)
From: <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
To: <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>, <jgg@...pe.ca>,
<leon@...nel.org>
Cc: <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<yang.yang29@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] IB/hfi1: switch to netif_napi_add()
From: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
There is no need to use netif_napi_add_weight() when the weight argument
is 64. See "net: drop the weight argument from netif_napi_add".
Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
Reviewed-by: xu xin <xu.xin16@....com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yunkai <zhang.yunkai@....com.cn>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/netdev_rx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/netdev_rx.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/netdev_rx.c
index 3dfa5aff2512..08080ca6cb2d 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/netdev_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/netdev_rx.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int hfi1_netdev_rxq_init(struct hfi1_netdev_rx *rx)
* right now.
*/
set_bit(NAPI_STATE_NO_BUSY_POLL, &rxq->napi.state);
- netif_napi_add_weight(dev, &rxq->napi, hfi1_netdev_rx_napi, 64);
+ netif_napi_add(dev, &rxq->napi, hfi1_netdev_rx_napi);
rc = msix_netdev_request_rcd_irq(rxq->rcd);
if (rc)
goto bail_context_irq_failure;
--
2.15.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists