linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] time/namespace: Refactor copy-pasted helper into one copy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAG48ez1_uq6a4rq_89Ua=2P1jSsDV7u4fCh2y13X9v2JfC5MsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:15:41 +0100
From:   Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] time/namespace: Refactor copy-pasted helper into one copy

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 8:18 PM Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> wrote:
> find_timens_vvar_page() is not arch-specific, as can be seen from how all
> five per-architecture versions of it are the same.
> (arm64, powerpc and riscv are exactly the same; x86 and s390 have two
> characters difference inside a comment, less blank lines, and mark the
> !CONFIG_TIME_NS version as inline.)
>
> Refactor the five copies into a central copy in kernel/time/namespace.c.
>
> Marked for stable backporting because it is a prerequisite for the
> following patch.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>

Should I resend this one without the Cc stable as a standalone cleanup patch?