linux-kernel - Re: [resend, PATCH net-next v1 2/2] net: thunderbolt: Use separate header data type for the Rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y4c1mtUlJfcxUQSi@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:51:06 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
        Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [resend, PATCH net-next v1 2/2] net: thunderbolt: Use separate
 header data type for the Rx

On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 09:46:16AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 06:13:59PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The same data type structure is used for bitwise operations and
> > regular ones. It makes sparse unhappy, for example:
> > 
> >   .../thunderbolt.c:718:23: warning: cast to restricted __le32
> > 
> >   .../thunderbolt.c:953:23: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types)
> >   .../thunderbolt.c:953:23:    expected restricted __wsum [usertype] wsum
> >   .../thunderbolt.c:953:23:    got restricted __be32 [usertype]
> > 
> > Split the header to bitwise one and specific for Rx to make sparse
> > happy. Assure the layout by involving static_assert() against size
> > and offsets of the member of the structures.

> I would much rather keep the humans reading this happy than add 20+
> lines just to silence a tool. Unless this of course is some kind of a
> real bug.

Actually, changing types to bitwise ones reduces the sparse noise
(I will double check this) without reducing readability.
Would it be accepted?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko