linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: protect the memory in cgroup from being oom killed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAWJmAYPUK+1GBS0R460pDvDKrLr9zs_X2LT2yQTP_85kND5Ew@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 19:33:01 +0800
From:   Tao pilgrim <pilgrimtao@...il.com>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc:     tj@...nel.org, lizefan.x@...edance.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
        corbet@....net, mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
        shakeelb@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        songmuchun@...edance.com, cgel.zte@...il.com,
        ran.xiaokai@....com.cn, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        zhengqi.arch@...edance.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, chengzhihao1@...wei.com,
        haolee.swjtu@...il.com, yuzhao@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org,
        vasily.averin@...ux.dev, vbabka@...e.cz, surenb@...gle.com,
        sfr@...b.auug.org.au, mcgrof@...nel.org, sujiaxun@...ontech.com,
        feng.tang@...el.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        chengkaitao@...iglobal.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: protect the memory in cgroup from being
 oom killed

On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 4:41 PM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/30/22 14:01, chengkaitao wrote:
> > From: chengkaitao <pilgrimtao@...il.com>
> >
>
> Yikes! Another patch from ZTE guys.
>
> I'm suspicious to patches sent from them due to bad reputation with
> kernel development community. First, they sent all patches via
> cgel.zte@...il.com (listed in Cc) but Greg can't sure these are really
> sent from them ([1] & [2]). Then they tried to workaround by sending
> from their personal Gmail accounts, again with same response from him
> [3]. And finally they sent spoofed emails (as he pointed out in [4]) -
> they pretend to send from ZTE domain but actually sent from their
> different domain (see raw message and look for X-Google-Original-From:
> header.

Hi Bagas Sanjaya,

I'm not an employee of ZTE, just an ordinary developer. I really don't know
all the details about community and ZTE, The reason why I cc cgel.zte@...il.com
is because the output of the script <get_maintainer.pl> has the
address <cgel.zte@...il.com>.

If there is any error in the format of the email, I will try my best
to correct it.

>
> I was about to review documentation part of this patch, but due to
> concerns above, I have to write this reply instead. So I'm not going
> to review, sorry for inconvenience.
>
> PS: Adding Greg to Cc: list.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yw94xsOp6gvdS0UF@kroah.com/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yylv5hbSBejJ58nt@kroah.com/
> [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y1EVnZS9BalesrC1@kroah.com/
> [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y3NrBvIV7lH2GrWz@kroah.com/
>
> --
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
>


-- 
Yours,
Kaitao Cheng