[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9F11BDDA-D9B6-4F61-9EAA-9B959BD4AE0A@didiglobal.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:25:06 +0000
From: 程垲涛 Chengkaitao Cheng
<chengkaitao@...iglobal.com>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Tao pilgrim <pilgrimtao@...il.com>
CC: "tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"lizefan.x@...edance.com" <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"mhocko@...nel.org" <mhocko@...nel.org>,
"roman.gushchin@...ux.dev" <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
"shakeelb@...gle.com" <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"songmuchun@...edance.com" <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
"cgel.zte@...il.com" <cgel.zte@...il.com>,
"ran.xiaokai@....com.cn" <ran.xiaokai@....com.cn>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"zhengqi.arch@...edance.com" <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
"ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Liam.Howlett@...cle.com" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
"chengzhihao1@...wei.com" <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>,
"haolee.swjtu@...il.com" <haolee.swjtu@...il.com>,
"yuzhao@...gle.com" <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
"willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
"vasily.averin@...ux.dev" <vasily.averin@...ux.dev>,
"vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"surenb@...gle.com" <surenb@...gle.com>,
"sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"mcgrof@...nel.org" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
"sujiaxun@...ontech.com" <sujiaxun@...ontech.com>,
"feng.tang@...el.com" <feng.tang@...el.com>,
"cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: protect the memory in cgroup from being
oom killed
On 2022/11/30 20:43,“Bagas Sanjaya”<bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 07:33:01PM +0800, Tao pilgrim wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 4:41 PM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11/30/22 14:01, chengkaitao wrote:
> > > > From: chengkaitao <pilgrimtao@...il.com>
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yikes! Another patch from ZTE guys.
> > >
> > > I'm suspicious to patches sent from them due to bad reputation with
> > > kernel development community. First, they sent all patches via
> > > cgel.zte@...il.com (listed in Cc) but Greg can't sure these are really
> > > sent from them ([1] & [2]). Then they tried to workaround by sending
> > > from their personal Gmail accounts, again with same response from him
> > > [3]. And finally they sent spoofed emails (as he pointed out in [4]) -
> > > they pretend to send from ZTE domain but actually sent from their
> > > different domain (see raw message and look for X-Google-Original-From:
> > > header.
> >
> > Hi Bagas Sanjaya,
> >
> > I'm not an employee of ZTE, just an ordinary developer. I really don't know
> > all the details about community and ZTE, The reason why I cc cgel.zte@...il.com
> > is because the output of the script <get_maintainer.pl> has the
> > address <cgel.zte@...il.com>.
> >
> > If there is any error in the format of the email, I will try my best
> > to correct it.
> >
>
> OK, thanks for clarification. At first I thought you were ZTE guys.
> Sorry for inconvenience.
>
> Now I ask: why do your email seem spoofed (sending from your gmail
> account but there is extra gmail-specific header that makes you like
> "sending" from your corporate email address? Wouldn't it be nice (and
> appropriate) if you can send and receive email with the latter address
> instead?
>
It may be caused by my previous habits.
Thanks for your advice. I'll do it.
Thanks.
--
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists