linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm: Make ksize() a reporting-only function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+fCnZeb_Q==L9V2Cc2JbOfh11ZH+V0FC5C_q0Rs1NQYm74dUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 15:11:35 +0100
From:   Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: Make ksize() a reporting-only function

On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 1:55 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> > I just realized there's an issue here with the tag-based modes, as
> > they align the unpoisoned area to 16 bytes.
> >
> > One solution would be to change the allocation size to 128 -
> > KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE - 5, the same way kmalloc_oob_right test does it,
> > so that the last 16-byte granule won't get unpoisoned for the
> > tag-based modes. And then check that the ptr[size] access fails only
> > for the Generic mode.
>
> Ah! Good point. Are you able to send a patch? I suspect you know exactly
> what to change; it might take me a bit longer to double-check all of
> those details.

Let's do it like this:

size_t size = 128 - KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE - 5, real_size.

...

/* These must trigger a KASAN report. */
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC))
    KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)ptr)[size]);
KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)ptr)[size + 5]);
KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)ptr)[real_size - 1]);

Thanks!