lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6a59b75-2ee2-ab9b-3038-2590df17d031@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 15:28:24 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sergio Lopez Pascual <slp@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: Mark KVM_SET_MEMORY_REGION and
 KVM_SET_MEMORY_ALIAS as obsoleted

On 11/28/22 19:30, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> E.g. KVM_{CREATE,GET,SET}_PIT are good examples of obsolete ioctls; they've been
> supplanted by newer variants, but KVM still supports the old ones too.
> 
> Alternatively (to marking them deprecated), can we completely remove all references
> to VM_SET_MEMORY_REGION and KVM_SET_MEMORY_ALIAS?  The cascading updates in api.rst
> will be painful, but it's one-time pain.

Yes, we should.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ