lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y4eFq4ZyQ2xHaISy@x1n>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:32:43 -0500
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] mm/hugetlb: Make page_vma_mapped_walk() safe to
 pmd unshare

On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 05:18:45PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 29.11.22 20:35, Peter Xu wrote:
> > Since page_vma_mapped_walk() walks the pgtable, it needs the vma lock
> > to make sure the pgtable page will not be freed concurrently.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >   include/linux/rmap.h | 4 ++++
> >   mm/page_vma_mapped.c | 5 ++++-
> >   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h
> > index bd3504d11b15..a50d18bb86aa 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/rmap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rmap.h
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/highmem.h>
> >   #include <linux/pagemap.h>
> >   #include <linux/memremap.h>
> > +#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
> >   /*
> >    * The anon_vma heads a list of private "related" vmas, to scan if
> > @@ -408,6 +409,9 @@ static inline void page_vma_mapped_walk_done(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
> >   		pte_unmap(pvmw->pte);
> >   	if (pvmw->ptl)
> >   		spin_unlock(pvmw->ptl);
> > +	/* This needs to be after unlock of the spinlock */
> > +	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(pvmw->vma))
> > +		hugetlb_vma_unlock_read(pvmw->vma);
> >   }
> >   bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw);
> > diff --git a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
> > index 93e13fc17d3c..f94ec78b54ff 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
> > @@ -169,10 +169,13 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
> >   		if (pvmw->pte)
> >   			return not_found(pvmw);
> > +		hugetlb_vma_lock_read(vma);
> >   		/* when pud is not present, pte will be NULL */
> >   		pvmw->pte = huge_pte_offset(mm, pvmw->address, size);
> > -		if (!pvmw->pte)
> > +		if (!pvmw->pte) {
> > +			hugetlb_vma_unlock_read(vma);
> >   			return false;
> > +		}
> >   		pvmw->ptl = huge_pte_lock(hstate, mm, pvmw->pte);
> >   		if (!check_pte(pvmw))
> 
> Looking at code like  mm/damon/paddr.c:__damon_pa_mkold() and reading the
> doc of page_vma_mapped_walk(), this might be broken.
> 
> Can't we get page_vma_mapped_walk() called multiple times?

Yes it normally can, but not for hugetlbfs?  Feel free to check:

	if (unlikely(is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))) {
                ...
		/* The only possible mapping was handled on last iteration */
		if (pvmw->pte)
			return not_found(pvmw);
        }

> Wouldn't we have to remember that we already took the lock to not lock
> twice, and to see if we really have to unlock in
> page_vma_mapped_walk_done() ?

-- 
Peter Xu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ