linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Replace macros by functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6a387a2a174572fd2db01451b2832c5fdc60bcf1.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 01 Dec 2022 18:58:32 +0100
From:   Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Replace macros by
 functions

On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 17:28 +0100, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 23:17:53 +0100
> Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Replace the DEFAULT_* test helpers by functions, as they don't
> > need the exta flexibility.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 82 +++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> > index 69869c7e2ab1..286185a59238 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> > @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ struct mop_desc {
> >  	uint8_t key;
> >  };
> >  
> > +const uint8_t NO_KEY = 0xff;
> > +
> >  static struct kvm_s390_mem_op ksmo_from_desc(const struct mop_desc *desc)
> >  {
> >  	struct kvm_s390_mem_op ksmo = {
> > @@ -85,7 +87,7 @@ static struct kvm_s390_mem_op ksmo_from_desc(const struct mop_desc *desc)
> >  		ksmo.flags |= KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_INJECT_EXCEPTION;
> >  	if (desc->_set_flags)
> >  		ksmo.flags = desc->set_flags;
> > -	if (desc->f_key) {
> > +	if (desc->f_key && desc->key != NO_KEY) {
> 
> is this change going to affect the behaviour?
> if so, please document it in the patch description

No, previously the absence of a key in the vararg would denote there not being a key,
now that a function is used there is an explicit no key argument, which is checked
here to see if we use key checking or not
> 
> >  		ksmo.flags |= KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION;
> >  		ksmo.key = desc->key;
> >  	}
> > @@ -268,34 +270,28 @@ static void prepare_mem12(void)
> >  #define ASSERT_MEM_EQ(p1, p2, size) \
> >  	TEST_ASSERT(!memcmp(p1, p2, size), "Memory contents do not match!")
> >  
> > -#define DEFAULT_WRITE_READ(copy_cpu, mop_cpu, mop_target_p, size, ...)		\
> > -({										\
> > -	struct test_info __copy_cpu = (copy_cpu), __mop_cpu = (mop_cpu);	\
> > -	enum mop_target __target = (mop_target_p);				\
> > -	uint32_t __size = (size);						\
> > -										\
> > -	prepare_mem12();							\
> > -	CHECK_N_DO(MOP, __mop_cpu, __target, WRITE, mem1, __size,		\
> > -			GADDR_V(mem1), ##__VA_ARGS__);				\
> > -	HOST_SYNC(__copy_cpu, STAGE_COPIED);					\
> > -	CHECK_N_DO(MOP, __mop_cpu, __target, READ, mem2, __size,		\
> > -			GADDR_V(mem2), ##__VA_ARGS__);				\
> > -	ASSERT_MEM_EQ(mem1, mem2, __size);					\
> > -})
> > +static void default_write_read(struct test_info copy_cpu, struct test_info mop_cpu,
> > +			       enum mop_target mop_target, uint32_t size, uint8_t key)
> > +{
> > +	prepare_mem12();
> > +	CHECK_N_DO(MOP, mop_cpu, mop_target, WRITE, mem1, size,
> > +		   GADDR_V(mem1), KEY(key));
> > +	HOST_SYNC(copy_cpu, STAGE_COPIED);
> > +	CHECK_N_DO(MOP, mop_cpu, mop_target, READ, mem2, size,
> > +		   GADDR_V(mem2), KEY(key));
> > +	ASSERT_MEM_EQ(mem1, mem2, size);
> > +}
> >  
> > -#define DEFAULT_READ(copy_cpu, mop_cpu, mop_target_p, size, ...)		\
> > -({										\
> > -	struct test_info __copy_cpu = (copy_cpu), __mop_cpu = (mop_cpu);	\
> > -	enum mop_target __target = (mop_target_p);				\
> > -	uint32_t __size = (size);						\
> > -										\
> > -	prepare_mem12();							\
> > -	CHECK_N_DO(MOP, __mop_cpu, __target, WRITE, mem1, __size,		\
> > -			GADDR_V(mem1));						\
> > -	HOST_SYNC(__copy_cpu, STAGE_COPIED);					\
> > -	CHECK_N_DO(MOP, __mop_cpu, __target, READ, mem2, __size, ##__VA_ARGS__);\
> > -	ASSERT_MEM_EQ(mem1, mem2, __size);					\
> > -})
> > +static void default_read(struct test_info copy_cpu, struct test_info mop_cpu,
> > +			 enum mop_target mop_target, uint32_t size, uint8_t key)
> > +{
> > +	prepare_mem12();
> > +	CHECK_N_DO(MOP, mop_cpu, mop_target, WRITE, mem1, size, GADDR_V(mem1));
> > +	HOST_SYNC(copy_cpu, STAGE_COPIED);
> > +	CHECK_N_DO(MOP, mop_cpu, mop_target, READ, mem2, size,
> > +		   GADDR_V(mem2), KEY(key));
> > +	ASSERT_MEM_EQ(mem1, mem2, size);
> > +}
> >  
> >  static void guest_copy(void)
> >  {
> > @@ -310,7 +306,7 @@ static void test_copy(void)
> >  
> >  	HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_INITED);
> >  
> > -	DEFAULT_WRITE_READ(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, t.size);
> > +	default_write_read(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, t.size, NO_KEY);
> >  
> >  	kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm);
> >  }

[...]