lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 20:05:23 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] IB/qib: don't use qib_wc_x86_64 for UML On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 09:15:31AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:22:04AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > I would advocate to add this line to whole drivers/infiniband. > > None of RDMA code makes sense for UML. > > software iWarp and RoCE absolutely make sense on UML. Ok, to be more pedantic "none of RDMA HW code ...". However does anybody use rxe or siw in UML? Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists