lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2022 18:07:58 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        Song Shuai <suagrfillet@...il.com>
Cc:     Song Shuai <suagrfillet@...il.com>, guoren@...nel.org,
        paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, apatel@...tanamicro.com,
        atishp@...shpatra.org, heiko@...ech.de, anshuman.khandual@....com,
        liaochang1@...wei.com, juerg.haefliger@...onical.com,
        wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] riscv : select
 FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY

On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 03:28:10PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:13:36PM +0800, Song Shuai wrote:
> > In RISC-V, -fpatchable-function-entry option is used to support
> > dynamic ftrace in this commit afc76b8b8011 ("riscv: Using
> > PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY instead of MCOUNT"). So recordmcount
> > don't have to be called to create the __mcount_loc section before
> > the vmlinux linking.
> > 
> > Here selects FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY to tell
> > Makefile not to run recordmcount.
> > 
> > Link_v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAAYs2=j3Eak9vU6xbAw0zPuoh00rh8v5C2U3fePkokZFibWs2g@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
> > Link_v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAAYs2=iYn8sLQB8oh+RzTKd2VKs8MXOLX6Mwpamx5gdVVN6mkA@mail.gmail.com/T/#m62138d7a76664798d00051818a438a601eff4cf1
> 
> Hey Song Shuai,
> 
> For future patches, please use normal "Link:" tags. If you're just
> linking to prior versions of the patch, just put them below the ---
> line so they don't end up in the git history.

> > Signed-off-by: Song Shuai <suagrfillet@...il.com>
> > Tested-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index 572973103d73..c19cddb8feb9 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ config ARCH_RV64I
> >  	select 64BIT
> >  	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 if CC_HAS_INT128
> >  	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL && MMU && $(cc-option,-fpatchable-function-entry=8)
> > +	select FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY if DYNAMIC_FTRACE

Also, why are these not added in alphabetical order, like the current
list is? I don't see HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE in linux-next from the other
day so that probably needs fixing in the series you are based on too.

> >  	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS if HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> >  	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS
> >  	select HAVE_SAMPLE_FTRACE_DIRECT
> > -- 
> > 2.20.1
> > 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ