| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20221201223923.873696-8-yuzhao@google.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 15:39:23 -0700
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Michael Larabel <Michael@...haellarabel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...gle.com,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH mm-unstable v1 7/8] mm: multi-gen LRU: clarify scan_control flags
Among the flags in scan_control:
1. sc->may_swap, which indicates swap constraint due to memsw.max, is
supported as usual.
2. sc->proactive, which indicates reclaim by memory.reclaim, may not
opportunistically skip the aging path, since it is considered less
latency sensitive.
3. !(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO), which indicates IO constraint,
prioritizes file LRU, since clean file folios are more likely to
exist.
4. sc->may_writepage and sc->may_unmap, which indicates opportunistic
reclaim, are rejected, since unmapped clean folios are already
prioritized. Scanning for more of them is likely futile and can
cause high reclaim latency when there is a large number of memcgs.
The rest are handled by the existing code.
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 44506eb96c9d..39724e7ae837 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -3191,6 +3191,9 @@ static int get_swappiness(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
+ if (!sc->may_swap)
+ return 0;
+
if (!can_demote(pgdat->node_id, sc) &&
mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages(memcg) < MIN_LRU_BATCH)
return 0;
@@ -4220,7 +4223,7 @@ static void walk_mm(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mm_struct *mm, struct lru_gen_
} while (err == -EAGAIN);
}
-static struct lru_gen_mm_walk *set_mm_walk(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
+static struct lru_gen_mm_walk *set_mm_walk(struct pglist_data *pgdat, bool force_alloc)
{
struct lru_gen_mm_walk *walk = current->reclaim_state->mm_walk;
@@ -4228,7 +4231,7 @@ static struct lru_gen_mm_walk *set_mm_walk(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(walk);
walk = &pgdat->mm_walk;
- } else if (!pgdat && !walk) {
+ } else if (!walk && force_alloc) {
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(current_is_kswapd());
walk = kzalloc(sizeof(*walk), __GFP_HIGH | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN);
@@ -4414,7 +4417,7 @@ static bool try_to_inc_max_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long max_seq,
goto done;
}
- walk = set_mm_walk(NULL);
+ walk = set_mm_walk(NULL, true);
if (!walk) {
success = iterate_mm_list_nowalk(lruvec, max_seq);
goto done;
@@ -4483,8 +4486,6 @@ static bool lruvec_is_reclaimable(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
DEFINE_MIN_SEQ(lruvec);
- VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(sc->memcg_low_reclaim);
-
/* see the comment on lru_gen_folio */
gen = lru_gen_from_seq(min_seq[LRU_GEN_FILE]);
birth = READ_ONCE(lruvec->lrugen.timestamps[gen]);
@@ -4740,12 +4741,8 @@ static bool isolate_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, struct sca
{
bool success;
- /* unmapping inhibited */
- if (!sc->may_unmap && folio_mapped(folio))
- return false;
-
/* swapping inhibited */
- if (!(sc->may_writepage && (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO)) &&
+ if (!(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO) &&
(folio_test_dirty(folio) ||
(folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapcache(folio))))
return false;
@@ -4842,9 +4839,8 @@ static int scan_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
__count_vm_events(PGSCAN_ANON + type, isolated);
/*
- * There might not be eligible pages due to reclaim_idx, may_unmap and
- * may_writepage. Check the remaining to prevent livelock if it's not
- * making progress.
+ * There might not be eligible folios due to reclaim_idx. Check the
+ * remaining to prevent livelock if it's not making progress.
*/
return isolated || !remaining ? scanned : 0;
}
@@ -5104,8 +5100,7 @@ static long get_nr_to_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, bool
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
DEFINE_MAX_SEQ(lruvec);
- if (mem_cgroup_below_min(memcg) ||
- (mem_cgroup_below_low(memcg) && !sc->memcg_low_reclaim))
+ if (mem_cgroup_below_min(memcg))
return 0;
if (!should_run_aging(lruvec, max_seq, sc, can_swap, &nr_to_scan))
@@ -5133,17 +5128,14 @@ static bool try_to_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
long nr_to_scan;
unsigned long scanned = 0;
unsigned long nr_to_reclaim = get_nr_to_reclaim(sc);
+ int swappiness = get_swappiness(lruvec, sc);
+
+ /* clean file folios are more likely to exist */
+ if (swappiness && !(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO))
+ swappiness = 1;
while (true) {
int delta;
- int swappiness;
-
- if (sc->may_swap)
- swappiness = get_swappiness(lruvec, sc);
- else if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc) && get_swappiness(lruvec, sc))
- swappiness = 1;
- else
- swappiness = 0;
nr_to_scan = get_nr_to_scan(lruvec, sc, swappiness);
if (nr_to_scan <= 0)
@@ -5274,12 +5266,13 @@ static void lru_gen_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc
struct blk_plug plug;
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(global_reclaim(sc));
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!sc->may_writepage || !sc->may_unmap);
lru_add_drain();
blk_start_plug(&plug);
- set_mm_walk(lruvec_pgdat(lruvec));
+ set_mm_walk(NULL, sc->proactive);
if (try_to_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc))
lru_gen_rotate_memcg(lruvec, MEMCG_LRU_YOUNG);
@@ -5335,11 +5328,19 @@ static void lru_gen_shrink_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!global_reclaim(sc));
+ /*
+ * Unmapped clean folios are already prioritized. Scanning for more of
+ * them is likely futile and can cause high reclaim latency when there
+ * is a large number of memcgs.
+ */
+ if (!sc->may_writepage || !sc->may_unmap)
+ return;
+
lru_add_drain();
blk_start_plug(&plug);
- set_mm_walk(pgdat);
+ set_mm_walk(pgdat, sc->proactive);
set_initial_priority(pgdat, sc);
@@ -5926,7 +5927,7 @@ static ssize_t lru_gen_seq_write(struct file *file, const char __user *src,
set_task_reclaim_state(current, &sc.reclaim_state);
flags = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
blk_start_plug(&plug);
- if (!set_mm_walk(NULL)) {
+ if (!set_mm_walk(NULL, true)) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto done;
}
--
2.39.0.rc0.267.gcb52ba06e7-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists