[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y4k3DrPW1eG9WB7r@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 23:21:50 +0000
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] container_of: add container_of_const() that
preserves const-ness of the pointer
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 08:30:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> container_of does not preserve the const-ness of a pointer that is
> passed into it, which can cause C code that passes in a const pointer to
> get a pointer back that is not const and then scribble all over the data
> in it. To prevent this, container_of_const() will preserve the const
> status of the pointer passed into it using the newly available _Generic()
> method.
"_const" in the name suggests that the macro would always take a const
argument. Could this be called e.g. container_of_safe() (for type-safe, but
full type_safe would be a bit long)?
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists