linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 07/10] powerpc/bpf: Only pad length-variable code at initial pass

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <ee5253722c2a1e26b8bec3691166d7081538c7cb.1669881248.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Date:   Thu,  1 Dec 2022 08:56:32 +0100
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 07/10] powerpc/bpf: Only pad length-variable code at initial pass

Now that two real additional passes are performed in case of extra pass
requested by BPF core, padding is not needed anymore except during
initial pass done before memory allocation to count maximum possible
program size.

So, only do the padding when 'image' is NULL.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c |  8 +++-----
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 12 +++++++-----
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 7c129fe810f5..6c45d953d4e8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -206,9 +206,6 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func
 
 	if (image && rel < 0x2000000 && rel >= -0x2000000) {
 		PPC_BL(func);
-		EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
-		EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
-		EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
 	} else {
 		/* Load function address into r0 */
 		EMIT(PPC_RAW_LIS(_R0, IMM_H(func)));
@@ -973,8 +970,9 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 			PPC_LI32(dst_reg_h, (u32)insn[i + 1].imm);
 			PPC_LI32(dst_reg, (u32)insn[i].imm);
 			/* padding to allow full 4 instructions for later patching */
-			for (j = ctx->idx - tmp_idx; j < 4; j++)
-				EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
+			if (!image)
+				for (j = ctx->idx - tmp_idx; j < 4; j++)
+					EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
 			/* Adjust for two bpf instructions */
 			addrs[++i] = ctx->idx * 4;
 			break;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 29ee306d6302..1c2931b4bc15 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -240,13 +240,14 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func
 	 * load the callee's address, but this may optimize the number of
 	 * instructions required based on the nature of the address.
 	 *
-	 * Since we don't want the number of instructions emitted to change,
+	 * Since we don't want the number of instructions emitted to increase,
 	 * we pad the optimized PPC_LI64() call with NOPs to guarantee that
 	 * we always have a five-instruction sequence, which is the maximum
 	 * that PPC_LI64() can emit.
 	 */
-	for (i = ctx->idx - ctx_idx; i < 5; i++)
-		EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
+	if (!image)
+		for (i = ctx->idx - ctx_idx; i < 5; i++)
+			EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
 
 	EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R12));
 	EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL());
@@ -938,8 +939,9 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 			tmp_idx = ctx->idx;
 			PPC_LI64(dst_reg, imm64);
 			/* padding to allow full 5 instructions for later patching */
-			for (j = ctx->idx - tmp_idx; j < 5; j++)
-				EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
+			if (!image)
+				for (j = ctx->idx - tmp_idx; j < 5; j++)
+					EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
 			/* Adjust for two bpf instructions */
 			addrs[++i] = ctx->idx * 4;
 			break;
-- 
2.38.1