linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 08/10] powerpc/bpf/32: Optimise some particular const operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu,  1 Dec 2022 08:56:33 +0100
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 08/10] powerpc/bpf/32: Optimise some particular const operations

Simplify multiplications and divisions with constants when the
constant is 1 or -1.

When the constant is a power of 2, replace them by bit shits.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 6c45d953d4e8..e6e156c0c5d6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -391,7 +391,13 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 			EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULW(dst_reg, dst_reg, src_reg));
 			break;
 		case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_K: /* (u32) dst *= (u32) imm */
-			if (imm >= -32768 && imm < 32768) {
+			if (imm == 1)
+				break;
+			if (imm == -1) {
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUBFIC(dst_reg, dst_reg, 0));
+			} else if (is_power_of_2((u32)imm)) {
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_SLWI(dst_reg, dst_reg, ilog2(imm)));
+			} else if (imm >= -32768 && imm < 32768) {
 				EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULI(dst_reg, dst_reg, imm));
 			} else {
 				PPC_LI32(_R0, imm);
@@ -411,6 +417,13 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 				EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUBFZE(dst_reg_h, dst_reg_h));
 				break;
 			}
+			if (imm > 0 && is_power_of_2(imm)) {
+				imm = ilog2(imm);
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM(dst_reg_h, dst_reg_h, imm, 0, 31 - imm));
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWIMI(dst_reg_h, dst_reg, imm, 32 - imm, 31));
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_SLWI(dst_reg, dst_reg, imm));
+				break;
+			}
 			bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, tmp_reg);
 			PPC_LI32(tmp_reg, imm);
 			EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULW(dst_reg_h, dst_reg_h, tmp_reg));
@@ -438,8 +451,12 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 			if (imm == 1)
 				break;
 
-			PPC_LI32(_R0, imm);
-			EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVWU(dst_reg, dst_reg, _R0));
+			if (is_power_of_2((u32)imm)) {
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_SRWI(dst_reg, dst_reg, ilog2(imm)));
+			} else {
+				PPC_LI32(_R0, imm);
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVWU(dst_reg, dst_reg, _R0));
+			}
 			break;
 		case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_K: /* (u32) dst %= (u32) imm */
 			if (!imm)
-- 
2.38.1