[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9fdd6581efb75511f3259ca663cd1afaee4ae4ac.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 10:28:18 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] IB/qib: don't use qib_wc_x86_64 for UML
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 11:22 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ config INFINIBAND_QIB
> > tristate "Intel PCIe HCA support"
> > depends on 64BIT && INFINIBAND_RDMAVT
> > depends on PCI
> > + depends on !UML
>
> I would advocate to add this line to whole drivers/infiniband.
> None of RDMA code makes sense for UML.
>
You could argue that one might want to eventually use kunit for some
bits and pieces in there, so it'd make sense to be able to build the
parts that _can_ be built, but I have no idea :)
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists