linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 tty-next 3/4] serial: 8250_pci1xxxx: Add RS485 support to quad-uart driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:47:11 +0200 (EET)
From:   Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Kumaravel Thiagarajan <kumaravel.thiagarajan@...rochip.com>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        macro@...am.me.uk, jay.dolan@...esio.com, cang1@...e.co.uk,
        u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, wander@...hat.com,
        etremblay@...tech-controls.com, jk@...abs.org,
        biju.das.jz@...renesas.com, geert+renesas@...der.be,
        phil.edworthy@...esas.com, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, colin.i.king@...il.com,
        Tharun Kumar P <tharunkumar.pasumarthi@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 tty-next 3/4] serial: 8250_pci1xxxx: Add RS485 support
 to quad-uart driver

On Thu, 1 Dec 2022, Kumaravel Thiagarajan wrote:

> pci1xxxx uart supports RS485 mode of operation in the hardware with
> auto-direction control with configurable delay for releasing RTS after
> the transmission. This patch adds support for the RS485 mode.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Tharun Kumar P <tharunkumar.pasumarthi@...rochip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tharun Kumar P <tharunkumar.pasumarthi@...rochip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kumaravel Thiagarajan <kumaravel.thiagarajan@...rochip.com>
> ---
> Changes in v6:
> - Modified datatype of delay_in_baud_periods to u64 to avoid overflows
> 
> Changes in v5:
> - Removed unnecessary assignments
> - Corrected styling issues in comments
> 
> Changes in v4:
> - No Change
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - Remove flags sanitization in driver which is taken care in core
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - move pci1xxxx_rs485_config to a separate patch with
>   pci1xxxx_rs485_supported.
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci1xxxx.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci1xxxx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci1xxxx.c
> index d5037e76b636..7585066d6baf 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci1xxxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci1xxxx.c
> @@ -145,6 +145,53 @@ static void pci1xxxx_set_divisor(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int baud,
>  	       port->membase + UART_BAUD_CLK_DIVISOR_REG);
>  }
>  
> +static int pci1xxxx_rs485_config(struct uart_port *port,
> +				 struct ktermios *termios,
> +				 struct serial_rs485 *rs485)
> +{
> +	u32 clock_div = readl(port->membase + UART_BAUD_CLK_DIVISOR_REG);

Maybe move this into the block where it's needed?

> +	u64 delay_in_baud_periods;
> +	u32 baud_period_in_ns;
> +	u32 data = 0;

data seems a bit too generic name for a variable? At minimum I'd suggest 
using cfg or mode_cfg (I couldn't guess where ADCL comes from, perhaps it
has some component which would make the variable name better).

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * pci1xxxx's uart hardware supports only RTS delay after
> +	 * Tx and in units of bit times to a maximum of 15
> +	 */
> +	if (rs485->flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED) {
> +		data = ADCL_CFG_EN | ADCL_CFG_PIN_SEL;
> +
> +		if (!(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND))
> +			data |= ADCL_CFG_POL_SEL;
> +
> +		if (rs485->delay_rts_after_send) {
> +			baud_period_in_ns =
> +				FIELD_GET(BAUD_CLOCK_DIV_INT_MSK, clock_div) *
> +				UART_BIT_SAMPLE_CNT;
> +			delay_in_baud_periods =
> +				rs485->delay_rts_after_send * NSEC_PER_MSEC /
> +				baud_period_in_ns;
> +			delay_in_baud_periods =
> +				min_t(u64, delay_in_baud_periods,
> +				      FIELD_MAX(ADCL_CFG_RTS_DELAY_MASK));
> +			data |= FIELD_PREP(ADCL_CFG_RTS_DELAY_MASK,
> +					   delay_in_baud_periods);
> +			rs485->delay_rts_after_send =
> +				baud_period_in_ns * delay_in_baud_periods /
> +				NSEC_PER_MSEC;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	writel(data, port->membase + ADCL_CFG_REG);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct serial_rs485 pci1xxxx_rs485_supported = {
> +	.flags = SER_RS485_ENABLED | SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND |
> +		 SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND,
> +	.delay_rts_after_send = 1,
> +	/* Delay RTS before send is not supported */
> +};
> +
>  static int pci1xxxx_setup(struct pci1xxxx_8250 *priv,
>  			  struct uart_8250_port *port, int port_idx)
>  {
> @@ -155,6 +202,8 @@ static int pci1xxxx_setup(struct pci1xxxx_8250 *priv,
>  	port->port.set_termios = serial8250_do_set_termios;
>  	port->port.get_divisor = pci1xxxx_get_divisor;
>  	port->port.set_divisor = pci1xxxx_set_divisor;
> +	port->port.rs485_config = pci1xxxx_rs485_config;
> +	port->port.rs485_supported = pci1xxxx_rs485_supported;
>  
>  	ret = serial8250_pci_setup_port(priv->pdev, port, 0, port_idx * 256, 0);
>  	if (ret < 0)
> 

Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>

-- 
 i.