linux-kernel - Re: [regression] Bug 216753 - 6e 6 ghz bands are disabled since 5.16 on intel ax211

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2026016246ef719605c9932feeb56b105833593b.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:33:34 +0000
From:   "Coelho, Luciano" <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
To:     "regressions@...mhuis.info" <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
        "Greenman, Gregory" <gregory.greenman@...el.com>
CC:     "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "chiluk@...ntu.com" <chiluk@...ntu.com>,
        "johannes@...solutions.net" <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        "regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [regression] Bug 216753 - 6e 6 ghz bands are disabled since 5.16 on intel ax211

On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 11:14 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.
> 
> Luca, I noticed a regression report in bugzilla where I'd like your
> advice on. To quote https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216753

Hi Thorsten wearing-the-regression-hat, 🙂

I'm not the maintainer of iwlwifi anymore, so I'm adding the new
maintainer here, Gregory Greenman.

Gregory, can you take a look?


> > It looks like the self-managed regulatory information is causing the 6ghz band to be disabled on my AX211 (in the US).  
> > iw reg get shows no 6ghz bands (output at the bottom).
> > 
> > $ sudo iw phy0 channel 
> > ...
> > Band 4:
> > 	* 5955 MHz [1] (disabled)
> > 	* 5975 MHz [5] (disabled)
> > 	* 5995 MHz [9] (disabled)
> >         ....(continues with all disabled 
> >         * 7115 MHz [233] (disabled)
> > ...
> > 
> > I was able to narrow this down to having been introduced during the 5.16 development window, as 5.15.79 linux-stable kernel works and the 5.16.12 does 
> > not (earlier builds of 5.16 kernel fail to boot on my machine for some reason). 
> > 
> > I found https://community.frame.work/t/kernel-5-16-6ghz-disabled-ax210/15675/5
> > and they imply that this regression was introduced by 
> > 698b166ed3464e1604a0e6a3e23cc1b529a5adc1
> > I haven't independently verified this commit as the definitive issue.
> 
> You authored 698b166ed346 ("iwlwifi: mvm: read 6E enablement flags from
> DSM and pass to FW"). As it is a regressions is ideally should be dealt
> with. But this area in tricky due to the legal implications. Hence I
> wonder: is there anything we can do about this, or is this simply a case
> where we have to bite the bullet and live with this regression?
> 
> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
> 
> P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of
> reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like
> this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public
> reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.