[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <067f0a84-2b73-f7ef-fe05-5d5015b68eab@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 13:44:30 +0100
From: Szymon Heidrich <szymon.heidrich@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent buffer overflow in UVC Gadget setup handler
On 01/12/2022 13:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 01:21:41PM +0100, Szymon Heidrich wrote:
>> Setup function uvc_function_setup permits control transfer
>> requests with up to 64 bytes of payload (UVC_MAX_REQUEST_SIZE),
>> data stage handler for OUT transfer uses memcpy to copy req->actual
>> bytes to uvc_event->data.data array of size 60. This may result
>> in an overflow of 4 bytes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Szymon Heidrich <szymon.heidrich@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> What commit id does this fix? Is it needed for stable kernels?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
As far as I understand this would be the original commit so cdda479f15cd13fa50a913ca85129c0437cc7b91.
I guess that it is also needed for stable kernels, yet please correct me if I'm wrong.
Best regards,
Szymon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists