[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <212daa8e-8f48-30d9-cfc8-ee5c2025f02c@icdsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 14:58:38 +0200
From: Ivan Zahariev <famzah@...soft.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/fpu] x86/fpu/xstate: Define new functions for clearing
fpregs and xstates
Hello,
On 29.11.2022 г. 20:16, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 11/29/22 03:19, Ivan Zahariev wrote:
>> Can you please take a look into this bug which syzbot tracked to a
>> commit of yours (b860eb8dce5906b14e3a7f3c771e0b3d6ef61b94). Even since
>> we switched from kernel 4.14 to 5.15 we are experiencing often random
>> segmentation faults with the following error in "dmesg":
> Which kernel are you running, exactly? There is a fix for the commit
> that you identified:
>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=484cea4f362e
> but it should have been in 5.15.
We are running 5.15.75 (LTS) but the problem started when we upgraded
from 5.15.31 to 5.15.59 and is present ever since. I erroneously said
that it's present into every 5.15.
I didn't do my homework well and blamed the commit by Yu-cheng Yu. But
this commit never landed into 5.15, nor the fix commit that you
referred. There are no functions fpu__clear_all(),
copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs(), copy_user_to_xstate() anywhere in the
sources of 5.15.75 or 5.15.31, so the 5.15 kernel is running with a
different FPU implementation.
Additionally, I tested the reproducer on older 5.15 kernels and on the
super-stable 4.14.256. They all emit the same "dmesg" error, so the
reproducer is not reliable to detect our problem.
I am sorry for wasting your time.
> Is there a chance you could test current mainline and see if the issue
> is still there?
That's our only option, it seems. Thank you.
Best regards.
--Ivan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists