[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfGi52s+LcTrBnBPDV91SbC4vf1prrLUpzQ_KZQQZGBuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 14:00:06 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] gpiolib: don't allow user-space to crash the
kernel with hot-unplugs
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 1:59 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> This is (hopefully) the final iteration of the changes that aim at fixing
> the situation in which the user-space can provoke a NULL-pointer derefence
> in the kernel when a GPIO device that's in use by user-space is removed.
>
> v5 -> v6:
> - signal an error in poll callbacks instead of returning 0 which would make
> the user-space assume a timeout occurred (which could lead to user-space
> spinning a timeout loop forever)
>
> v4 -> v5:
> - try to acquire the semaphore for reading and bail out of syscall callbacks
> immediately in case of lock contention
>
> v3 -> v4:
> - use function typedefs to make code cleaner
> - add a blank line after down_write()
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - drop the helper variable in patch 1/2 as we won't be using it in 2/2
> - refactor patch 2/2 to use locking wrappers around the syscall callbacks
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - add missing gdev->chip checks in patch 1/2
> - add a second patch that protects the structures that can be accessed
> by user-space calls against concurrent removal
>
> Bartosz Golaszewski (2):
> gpiolib: cdev: fix NULL-pointer dereferences
> gpiolib: protect the GPIO device against being dropped while in use by
> user-space
>
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 4 +
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h | 5 +
> 3 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.37.2
>
I know Kent and Linus left their review tags already, I will add them
when applying.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists