[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93f9093b-abec-db7e-a945-263cd9355c08@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 09:45:12 +0800
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
To: tj@...nel.org, josef@...icpanda.com, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A few cleanup and bugfix patches for blk-iocost
Hi jens,
on 10/18/2022 8:19 PM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> This series contain a few patch to correct comment, correct trace of
> vtime_rate and so on. More detail can be found in the respective
> changelogs.
>
> ---
> v2:
> Thanks Tejun for review and comment!
> Add Acked-by tag from Tejun.
> Correct description in patch 3/5 and 4/5.
> Drop "blk-iocost: Avoid to call current_hweight_max if iocg->inuse
> == iocg->active"
> Drop "blk-iocost: Remove redundant initialization of struct ioc_gq"
> Drop "blk-iocost: Get ioc_now inside weight_updated"
> ---
>
> Kemeng Shi (5):
> blk-iocost: Fix typo in comment
> blk-iocost: Reset vtime_base_rate in ioc_refresh_params
> blk-iocost: Trace vtime_base_rate instead of vtime_rate
> blk-iocost: Remove vrate member in struct ioc_now
> blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init
>
> block/blk-iocost.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> include/trace/events/iocost.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Could you apply this patchset?
By the way, my apply for an cloud variant of email was just passed
a few days ago. Is this mail still in spam?
Thanks.
--
Best wishes
Kemeng Shi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists